Welcome to our new forum! All existing NW Cryobank forum users will need to reset their passwords. Click forgot password and enter your email address to receive the link. Email us at [email protected] with any questions.
46 weeks pregnant. Seriously?
I almost posted a long, drawn out explanation for my question but all I really want to know is the likelihood of a midwife permitting and encouraging or, as it was put to me, "routinely" delivering babies at 46 weeks. I thought for sure that beyond 42 weeks a midwife would be recommending an induction and removing herself from the pregnancy due to liability if patient didn't take advice.
Or, maybe the better question is, can a baby be delivered healthy at 46 weeks? I thought placentas started to breakdown at a certain point and wouldn't nourish baby sufficiently. I was told today I needed to get my head out of my behind and that women needed to allow their bodies to "do what they do naturally" and that midwives are active participants in 46 week pregnancies!
I am a proponent of no to low intervention but not at risk of mom or baby's life! So am I really mistaken?
Or, maybe the better question is, can a baby be delivered healthy at 46 weeks? I thought placentas started to breakdown at a certain point and wouldn't nourish baby sufficiently. I was told today I needed to get my head out of my behind and that women needed to allow their bodies to "do what they do naturally" and that midwives are active participants in 46 week pregnancies!
I am a proponent of no to low intervention but not at risk of mom or baby's life! So am I really mistaken?
Baby boy joined us April 11, 2013, and we are so in *LOVE*!
0
Comments
Me: Child dev. degree, nanny to 5 for 5.5yrs, digital print artist, portrait photographer.
*Leaving. Message me if you'd like to keep in touch*
ICI #1 April 2012- BFN ICI #2 March 2013 BFN
DH had vasectomy reversal October 2013. It worked!!!
Counts are low, varicocele surgery was in August 2014.
IVF February 2016 w/ICSI transferred 2 perfect blastocysts. It's twins!!!!
Two perfect, beautiful boys born 10/24/16!!
BFP- 8/9/09 at 10DPO, after 4 years TTC. Sydnee born on April 14th 2010. BFP #2 at 11DPO 9/29/12. Due 6/11/13
I have read studies though that say risks to baby after 42 weeks gestation are similar to those who are born before 37 weeks gestation.
I am so miserable and impatient, I have never gone past 39 weeks
Mommy to Twins plus One - donor 733
Imagine that! Someone lying online!
TTC No. 2 since Aug. 2014; IVF #1 - Cxld; IVF #2 - BFN
Need to update a ticker, Silas Anthony Jordon born Oct 11, 2013. 6th baby, so much love!
It is possible that she could have had her due date off, but even if she did you'd think it wouldn't be more than 2 weeks off. I can't BELIEVE anyone would go that long. I'd NEVER go that long!! If she was telling the truth about 46 weeks and wasn't actually lying, then there was something wrong somewhere!
My sister in laws midwife induced at 42 weeks. He told her that there were greater risks in going past 42 weeks than getting induced. My sister-in-law went to 42 weeks and was lucky enough that her water broke less than 2 hours before she was scheduled to be induced.
My youngest brother was due in October of 1970. Thanksgiving rolled around & mom was still pregnant. The next day, Nov 27, she went to the hospital to be induced. It didn’t work so they sent her home. She gave birth on Dec 6! The doctor said, “ He wasn’t going to last too much longer. The cord was gangrene!” She always said she carried him 11 months whereas she probably just entered her 11 month. True story!